Pre- and Post-Pandemic Religiosity and Mental Health Outcomes: A Prospective Study.

Relatively few studies have prospectively examined the effects of known protective factors, such as religion, on pandemic-related outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pre- and post-pandemic trajectories and psychological effects of religious beliefs and religious attendance. Male and female adults (N = 189) reported their beliefs in religious importance (RI) and their religious attendance (RA) both before (T1) and after (T2) the pandemic's onset. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to track RI and RA from T1 to T2 and to test their effects on psychological outcomes at T1 and T2. The participants who reported a decrease in religious importance and attendance were greater in number than those who reported an increase, with RI (36.5% vs. 5.3%) and RA (34.4% vs. 4.8%). The individuals with decreased RI were less likely to know someone who had died from COVID-19 (O.R. =0.4, p = 0.027). The T1 RI predicted overall social adjustment (p < 0.05) and lower suicidal ideation (p = 0.05). The T2 RI was associated with lower suicidal ideation (p < 0.05). The online RA (T2) was associated with lower depression (p < 0.05) and lower anxiety (p < 0.05). Further research is needed to evaluate the mechanisms driving decreases in religiosity during pandemics. Religious beliefs and online religious attendance were beneficial during the pandemic, which bodes well for the use of telemedicine in therapeutic approaches.

The effects of the pandemic on mental health in persons with and without a psychiatric history.

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies are needed to assess the influence of pre-pandemic risk factors on mental health outcomes following the COVID-19 pandemic. From direct interviews prior to (T1), and then in the same individuals after the pandemic onset (T2), we assessed the influence of personal psychiatric history on changes in symptoms and wellbeing. METHODS: Two hundred and four (19-69 years/117 female) individuals from a multigenerational family study were followed clinically up to T1. Psychiatric symptom changes (T1-to-T2), their association with lifetime psychiatric history (no, only-past, and recent psychiatric history), and pandemic-specific worries were investigated. RESULTS: At T2 relative to T1, participants with recent psychopathology (in the last 2 years) had significantly fewer depressive (mean, M = 41.7 v. 47.6) and traumatic symptoms (M = 6.6 v. 8.1, p < 0.001), while those with no and only-past psychiatric history had decreased wellbeing (M = 22.6 v. 25.0, p < 0.01). Three pandemic-related worry factors were identified: Illness/death, Financial, and Social isolation. Individuals with recent psychiatric history had greater Illness/death and Financial worries than the no/only-past groups, but these worries were unrelated to depression at T2. Among individuals with no/only-past history, Illness/death worries predicted increased T2 depression [B = 0.6(0.3), p < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: As recent psychiatric history was not associated with increased depression or anxiety during the pandemic, new groups of previously unaffected persons might contribute to the increased pandemic-related depression and anxiety rates reported. These individuals likely represent incident cases that are first detected in primary care and other non-specialty clinical settings. Such settings may be useful for monitoring future illness among newly at-risk individuals.

Initial mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) measurement is a risk factor for mortality in hypertensive COVID-19 positive hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) is associated with severe COVID-19 infection; however, it remains unknown if the level of blood pressure (BP) predicts mortality. We tested whether the initial BP in the emergency department of hospitalized patients portends mortality in COVID-19 positive(+) patients. METHODS: Data from COVID-19(+) and negative (-) hospitalized patients at Stony Brook University Hospital from March to July 2020 were included. The initial mean arterial BPs (MABPs) were categorized into tertiles (T) of MABP (65-85 [T1], 86-97 [T2] and ≥98 [T3] mmHg). Differences were evaluated using univariable (t-tests, chi-squared) tests. Multivariable (MV) logistic regression analyses were computed to assess links between MABP and mortality in hypertensive COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: 1549 adults were diagnosed with COVID-19 (+) and 2577 tested negative (-). Mortality of COVID-19(+) was 4.4-fold greater than COVID-19(-) patients. Though HTN prevalance did not differ between COVID-19 groups, the presenting systolic BP, diastolic BP, and MABP were lower in the COVID-19(+) vs (-) cohort. When subjects were categorized into tertiles of MABP, T2 tertile of MABP had the lowest mortality and the T1 tertile of MABP had greatest mortality compared to T2; however, no difference in mortality was noted across tertiles of MABP in COVID-19 (-). MV analysis of COVID-19 (+) subjects exposed death as a risk factor for T1 MABP. Next, the mortality of those with a historic diagnosis of hypertension or normotension were studied. On MV analysis, T1 MABP, gender, age, and first respiratory rate correlated with mortality while lymphocyte count inversely correlated with death in hypertensive COVID-19 (+) patients while neither T1 nor T3 categories of MABP predicted death in non-hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS: Low-normal admitting MABP in COVID-19 (+) subjects with a historical diagnosis of HTN is associated with mortality and may assist in identifying those at greatest mortality risk.